Sign in

Blog · Data quality and reconciliation

Identity and reconciliation: the sum that must hold, and the work of making it hold

The difference between an identity, a sum that must be true by construction, region equals team equals person equals account equals the ledger, and a reconciliation, the work of finding why it is not and fixing the source, why the identity is checked on every upload and the reconciliation is done on the exceptions it lists, the three causes that account for most failures, and why a number is never adjusted to make an identity hold.

The short answerAn identity is a sum that must be true: the revenue by region equals the revenue by team equals the revenue by person equals the revenue by account equals the ledger. It is checked, not made. A reconciliation is the work done when it fails: finding the rows, a duplicate, a missing mapping, a period cut wrong, and fixing them at the source. The identity runs on every upload in seconds; the reconciliation is done on the exception list it produces. The rule that separates them is that a number is never adjusted to make the identity hold; the source is fixed and the upload runs again.

An identity is a sentence with an equals sign that has to be true. A reconciliation is what happens when it is not. Companies that confuse them either adjust totals until they match, or spend a week a month making them match by hand. This guide sets out both, the rule between them, and the three causes behind most failures.

The two definitions

Identity Reconciliation
Is A sum that must hold by construction The work of finding why it does not
When Every upload, automatically, in seconds On the exception list the identity produces
Produces Pass, or a list of rows Fixed source data
Never Adjusted to pass Done by changing the total

Two kinds of identity

Kind Example
Roll-up Σ region = Σ team = Σ person = Σ account = ledger
Decomposition bookings = Σ billings = Σ revenue over the term; open pipeline = clean + flagged; obligations = mapped + in progress + unmapped

The three causes behind most failures

Cause Looks like Fix at source
A duplicate Account under two reps; a customer twice under two identifiers; a line on two credit splits Dated mapping; confirmed merge; split corrected
A missing mapping Revenue with no owner; a ship-to with no facility; a SKU with no line The mapping row, dated
A period cut wrong Ledger on the month, activities on 30 days; invoice date against ship date Re-export on the same cut

The rule

The identity is checked. The source is fixed. The number is never adjusted.

A worked failure

Identity Result
Σ reps' revenue = ledger $12.04m vs $12.00m: fail by $41,000
Row Cause
Account 2207 under R-04 and R-11 from 1 July Duplicate: the move record has no end date on R-04's assignment
Three invoice lines on 2207 counted under both $41,000

The reconciliation: end R-04's assignment on 30 June in the assignment file. Re-upload. The identity holds. Coverage, concentration and credit for 2207 are all right now, because the row was fixed, not the total.

What an adjustment would have hidden

If the $41,000 had been subtracted from the total, the revenue identity would have passed, and 2207 would still be double-counted in R-04's coverage, in the top-ten share, and in the commission run. The adjusted total is the most expensive fix there is.

Where it goes wrong

Totals adjusted. The row stays wrong everywhere else.

Identity run monthly, by hand. A week of reconciliation, every month.

Exception list without owners. Known, unfixed.

Decomposition identities skipped. Bookings called revenue for a year.

Every upload, the identity; every exception, the reconciliation

Covirage checks the identities on every upload, lists the failing rows with the probable cause, and never adjusts a number. The roll-up hierarchy guide covers the first kind of identity, and the identity by industry hub covers what has to sum on each desk.

Questions people ask

Why not just adjust the total?

Because an adjusted total hides a row that is wrong, and the row is wrong in every other table too. The account under two reps is double-counted in coverage, in concentration and in credit; adjusting the revenue total fixes none of them. The identity's failure is the finding; the adjustment erases it.

How long does reconciliation take?

The first time, days, because the failures have accumulated for years. After that, minutes, because the identity catches each new failure the month it appears and the exception list has one or two rows. A reconciliation that takes a week every month is one where the identity is not being run on every upload.

Are all identities the same kind?

Two kinds. Roll-up identities: the same total at every level of a hierarchy. Decomposition identities: a total equals the sum of named parts, bookings equal billings equal revenue over a term, or open pipeline equals clean plus flagged. Both are checked the same way and fail the same way.