Sign in

Blog · Alternatives and comparisons · Wealth managers

How to choose analytics software for wealth managers: questions, data and traps

How wealth firms should choose analytics software: start from the questions, check the data you hold, ask vendors ten questions, avoid the traps.

The short answerStart from the questions wealth firms ask every month, not from features. List the exports you already hold, ask every vendor what it needs before the first answer and whether its AI calculates figures, and check that every total reconciles. Then compare the first-year cost, all in.

Most buying decisions for analytics start from a feature list. For wealth firms the better start is the questions that come back every month, the files already on hand, and the traps that make a tool look right in a demonstration and wrong in the first board meeting.

Start from the questions

The question The measure behind it
Did the book grow, or did the market? Net new assets
Which clients are moving money out? Outflow watch
How much do our clients hold elsewhere? Held-away assets
Which valuable clients have not been contacted? Contact recency by value
How dependent is the firm on a few advisers? Adviser concentration
Where are we not covering the next generation? Next-generation coverage

Any tool you consider should answer these from your data, not from a sample. Ask to see it.

The data you already hold

  • Cash movement file
  • Asset file
  • Fact-find and review records
  • Client master
  • CRM
  • Fee ledger
  • Service model costs
  • Activity

If a vendor needs a warehouse built before it can read these, count that in the cost and the time.

Ten questions to ask any vendor

  1. What does it need in place before the first answer? A warehouse, a data model, a modelling language, a partner? Ask for the list and the typical weeks.
  2. Who does the setup, and who maintains it? Your team, the vendor, or a partner, and what that costs after year one.
  3. Does the AI calculate figures, or choose from computed ones? A language model that writes queries or code can produce a plausible wrong number. Ask what it is allowed to do.
  4. Does every total reconcile to a control figure? Ask to see a bridge that does not sum and what the product does about it.
  5. Can every figure be opened to its rows? An answer nobody can check becomes a debate in the meeting.
  6. What does it cost in the first year, all in? Licences, consumption, implementation, modelling and training, not only the seat price.
  7. How does data arrive, and who holds credentials? A file your systems already export, a scheduled drop, or a live connection with the vendor holding keys.
  8. What happens to the data, and where is it stored? Residency, retention, deletion, and whether names can be replaced with identifiers.
  9. Can we see it on our own data before we sign? A demonstration on a sample dataset tells you little about your own.
  10. What does the tool do when it cannot answer? It should say so. A confident guess does more harm than no answer.

Checks specific to wealth managers

Ask whether the tool enforces these, and what it does when they fail:

  • Assets: Opening assets + inflows − outflows + market movement − fees = closing assets
  • Households: Accounts = linked to a household + unlinked
  • Concentration: Adviser assets sum to the firm total; each client has one lead adviser
  • Reviews: Due = completed on time + completed late + overdue

The traps

Net new assets without the market. In a rising market every adviser looks like they are growing.

Held-away assets. Recorded in a fact-find, never totalled, never ranked.

Next-generation coverage. The largest predictable outflow a firm faces, and rarely on any report.

Measures to leave out

Assets under management as a growth measure. It is mostly the market.

Number of clients. Counts a household three times until consolidated.

Meetings held. Replace with recency by value and review completion.

A scorecard

Criterion Weight Tool A Tool B Covirage
Answers our six questions on our own data High
Time to the first answer High
Needs a warehouse or data team Medium
AI calculates figures, or only explains computed ones High
Every total reconciles; figures open to rows High
First-year cost, all in Medium

Where Covirage fits

Covirage reads the exports above, answers the questions with figures our tools compute and check, and is set up for you within a week. See analytics software for wealth managers compared, AI analytics for wealth managers and Covirage for Wealth managers.

For the measures in full, with formulas and exports, read Client KPIs for wealth managers.

Questions people ask

What should wealth firms look for in analytics software?

The answer to their own questions, from the data they already hold, with every figure reconciled. Features matter less than what the tool needs before the first answer and who maintains it.

Is a BI suite enough for wealth firms?

It can be, with a warehouse and someone to build and maintain the model. Without them, the dashboard shows what changed and the explanation is still an analyst's job.

What data do wealth firms already hold?

Usually: cash movement file, asset file, fact-find and review records, client master, crm, fee ledger. Most analytics questions in this industry can be answered from those exports.