Sign in

Blog · Wallet share and penetration · Consulting and advisory

What is a good realization rate? The answer depends on three things you can measure

The honest answer to what realization rate a law, accounting or consulting firm should have: the 85 to 95 percent figures quoted depend on which realization is meant, billing realization against recorded time or collection realization against billed, on the rate card the time was valued at, and on the client and matter mix. This page gives the ranges by firm type, the three measurable things that set the right figure for one firm, and the table to compute before anyone quotes a percentage.

The short answerA good realization rate depends on which one is meant. Billing realization, fees billed over time recorded at standard rates, runs 80 to 92 percent at most firms; collection realization, cash collected over fees billed, runs 90 to 97; the two multiplied is the figure that reaches the partners. It depends on the rate card: a firm that has quietly raised its standard rates reports falling realization with no change in what clients pay. And it depends on the client mix, because realization per client ranges from 60 to 105 percent inside one firm, and the firm figure is the average of that spread. Compute both realizations, at a fixed rate card, per client against the client's own history, and the number becomes one the firm can act on.

Realization is what the firm gets over what it recorded, and there are two of them. This page sets them out, gives the ranges, and shows the three things that make one firm's figure mean something.

The two realizations, and the ranges

Measure Formula Law, typical Accounting, typical Consulting, typical
Billing realization Fees billed ÷ time at standard rates 82 to 92 percent 80 to 90 percent 75 to 90 percent
Collection realization Cash collected ÷ fees billed 92 to 97 percent 93 to 98 percent 90 to 97 percent
Net realization Product of the two 76 to 89 percent 75 to 88 percent 68 to 87 percent

Consulting runs lower on billing realization because more work is fixed-fee against time budgets that overrun.

The three things that decide it

1. Which realization, and the product

Stage Amount Rate vs prior stage
Time recorded at standard $10,000,000
Fees billed $8,800,000 88% billing realization
Cash collected $8,360,000 95% collection realization
Net 83.6%

The firm quoting 95 is quoting collection. The firm quoting 88 is quoting billing. The partners feel 83.6.

2. A fixed rate card

Year Standard rate Hours Time at standard Billed Realization
Last $500 20,000 $10,000,000 $8,800,000 88%
This $550 20,000 $11,000,000 $8,900,000 81%

Billed rose one percent. Realization fell seven points. The clients on agreed rates paid what they agreed; the rate card moved. At last year's card, this year's realization is 89 percent, and the finding is that the rate rise was realized on almost nobody. Realized rate per hour, $440 to $445, is the figure that survives the card change.

3. Per client, against the client's own history

Client Realization, this year Prior year Three years ago Write-offs this year Decided?
A 70% 71% 70% $0 Negotiated discount, on file
B 74% 85% 92% $180,000 Nothing on file
C 102% 100% 98% $0 Premium agreed

B is the row. The realization by client piece works the list, and the utilization against realization piece does the same per fee earner.

The table to compute

Measure Formula From
Billing realization Billed ÷ time at standard, per client, matter, fee earner Time and billing system
Collection realization Collected ÷ billed, per client Billing and cash
Net realization Product Above
Realized rate per hour Billed ÷ hours Time and billing
Same at prior rate card Billed ÷ time at prior standard Time, prior rates
Write-offs per client with a reason Time recorded − time billed, by matter, with the write-off code Billing system
Identity Time at standard = billed + written off + written down + WIP still open Time and billing

Where the question goes wrong

Which realization, unstated. Ninety-five reported; eighty-four received.

Rate rise read as realization fall. Partners told to bill harder for a card change.

Firm average only. B's twenty-point slide inside an 88.

Write-offs without reasons. A discount that grew matter by matter and was never decided.

The short answer

A good realization rate is both realizations, computed at a fixed rate card, per client against the client's own history, with every write-off carrying a reason. Net realization of 80 to 88 percent is normal range for most firms; the per-client trend and the realized rate per hour are what tell a firm whether its rate rises reached anyone. Covirage computes all of it from the time, billing and cash exports every month with the identity checked.

Questions people ask

Which realization should we track?

Both, and the product. Billing realization is what partners give away before the bill goes out; collection realization is what clients refuse or delay after. A firm at 90 and 95 realizes 85.5 cents of every standard-rate dollar recorded. Each has a different owner: the first is the billing partner, the second is credit control and the engagement terms.

Why did our realization fall after the rate rise?

Because realization is measured against standard rates and the standard rates went up. If clients on fixed fees or agreed discounts paid the same, realization fell by exactly the rate increase. Measure at a fixed rate card across periods, or measure realized rate per hour in currency, and the fall disappears. A rate rise that is not realized is a finding; a rate rise that is masquerading as a realization fall is not.

What is a bad realization on one client?

One that fell against its own history without a decision. A client at 70 percent that has been at 70 for five years has a negotiated discount; a client that was at 92 and is at 74 has had time written off matter by matter until the discount grew. The client-level trend, with the write-offs listed, is the table.