Blog · Finance metrics and formulas · Finance and FP&A teams
Adjusted return on equity uses an approved definition of earnings and common equity. Follow an after-tax profit bridge, an average-equity reconciliation and the checks that keep the comparison consistent.
Adjusted return on equity measures earnings after approved adjustments relative to average equity under a stated management policy. It can help explain underlying performance, but the definition must travel with the percentage. Show reported ROE, the profit bridge and the equity bridge together.
Reported ROE = Reported common earnings / Average reported common equity
Adjusted ROE = Adjusted common earnings / Average adjusted common equity
Average adjusted common equity = (Adjusted opening equity + Adjusted closing equity) / 2
There is no single adjusted-ROE formula beyond that structure. Finance must specify which earnings items qualify, how tax is calculated, which equity components change and how prior periods are treated. The controller should own the reconciliation; the finance leader should approve the policy before FP&A uses the result in performance reporting.
For public reporting, additional requirements can apply. The SEC's non-GAAP financial measure guidance discusses potentially misleading exclusions of recurring operating expenses, inconsistent treatment between periods and adjustments that remove charges while retaining comparable gains. Those are useful disciplines for internal management analysis too, though this example is not a public-disclosure checklist.
The basic ratio is covered in the financial ratios guide. The purpose here is to prove exactly how a management definition changes that ratio.
Consider a fictional US company's year ended December 31, 2025. Its approved internal policy removes the identified plant-closure charge and property-disposal gain from common earnings, with their associated tax effects. It retains ordinary operating expenses and applies the same eligibility criteria to gains and losses.
The denominator policy excludes positive accumulated other comprehensive income, or AOCI, from common equity at each balance date. Management wants to show this separate capital view; the exclusion is a convention for this example, not a claim that adjusted equity is universally preferable. Current-period other comprehensive income is already outside the net-income numerator and is not subtracted from earnings again.
The company also presents a profit-only intermediate calculation so the effect of the denominator policy is visible. Neither earnings normalization nor the AOCI exclusion changes the reported ledger.
Bring three schedules to the calculation: common earnings by account, adjustments with supporting references and tax effects, and common equity by component at each balance date. Use the same entity, currency, period and shareholder scope throughout. Keep approval references and explanations beside the adjustment rows so another reviewer can reproduce the policy application.
Reported common earnings are $2,200,000. The identified closure charge is $800,000 before tax, and the property-disposal gain is $400,000 before tax. The supplied tax schedule assigns an illustrative combined current-and-deferred tax effect of 25.0% to each item; that assumption is not a statutory tax-rate claim.
| Profit bridge | Amount (USD) |
|---|---|
| Reported common earnings | 2,200,000 |
| Add back: qualifying closure charge, before tax | 800,000 |
| Remove: associated tax benefit, 800,000 × 25.0% | −200,000 |
| Remove: qualifying property-disposal gain, before tax | −400,000 |
| Reverse: associated tax expense, 400,000 × 25.0% | 100,000 |
| Adjusted common earnings | 2,500,000 |
The before-tax adjustments total $400,000, and their tax effects total −$100,000. The net increase is therefore $300,000, which bridges $2,200,000 to $2,500,000. The closure adjustment increases earnings by $600,000 after tax; removing the gain reduces earnings by $300,000 after tax.
Show the tax rows separately rather than hiding them inside net adjustments. The same SEC guidance, in Question 102.11, says performance measures should include current and deferred income tax expense commensurate with the adjusted profitability measure and present income tax adjustments separately. In a real schedule, use the actual supported tax treatment for each item rather than applying one rate automatically.
The SEC's financial statement guide distinguishes period earnings from point-in-time balance sheet amounts and describes the statement of shareholders' equity. That equity movement schedule is the starting point for checking the denominator.
| Equity bridge | Opening balance (USD) | Closing balance (USD) | Average balance (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported common equity | 20,000,000 | 24,000,000 | 22,000,000 |
| Approved exclusion of positive AOCI | −1,000,000 | −2,000,000 | −1,500,000 |
| Adjusted common equity | 19,000,000 | 22,000,000 | 20,500,000 |
The adjusted average is (19,000,000 + 22,000,000) / 2 = $20,500,000. The independent bridge gives the same figure: reported average equity of $22,000,000 less the $1,500,000 average AOCI exclusion.
Reported equity also needs a movement check:
| Reported equity movement | Amount (USD) |
|---|---|
| Opening common equity | 20,000,000 |
| Add: reported common earnings | 2,200,000 |
| Add: share issuance | 1,400,000 |
| Less: dividends | −600,000 |
| Add: other comprehensive income | 1,000,000 |
| Closing common equity | 24,000,000 |
The $1,000,000 other comprehensive income movement also bridges opening AOCI of $1,000,000 to closing AOCI of $2,000,000. No earnings adjustment is inserted into this reported-equity rollforward.
All ratios below use unrounded dollar inputs and are displayed to two decimal places.
| Measure | Common earnings (USD) | Average common equity (USD) | Calculation | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported ROE | 2,200,000 | 22,000,000 | 2,200,000 / 22,000,000 | 10.00% |
| Profit-only adjusted ROE | 2,500,000 | 22,000,000 | 2,500,000 / 22,000,000 | 11.36% |
| Fully adjusted ROE under this policy | 2,500,000 | 20,500,000 | 2,500,000 / 20,500,000 | 12.20% |
This presentation separates the earnings normalization from the smaller denominator. Business leaders can discuss the closure and disposal with the controller, while finance can assess whether the capital convention helps the intended decision. The adjustment bridge explains a management view; it does not establish a valuation or a required return.
For comparisons outside the company, return on equity by industry explains peer selection and consistent weighting. Never compare this adjusted result with a peer's reported ROE without reconciling the definitions.
Bring your reported earnings, approved adjustment schedule, tax effects and equity balances in a file: Covirage maps the columns, and its tools compute and check the figures. The external AI model explains the bridge, with every figure traced to its rows. Create a free Covirage account, which takes about a minute, then set up your business and bring a sample of your own data.
See Covirage for finance teams for the team context.
No. Companies may adjust different earnings items and equity components, so the label alone does not establish comparability. Read the policy, reconciliation, tax treatment and averaging method before comparing results. Keep the reported measure alongside the management-defined version.
No. An adjustment needs a documented rationale and an approved policy applied consistently to similar gains and losses. Costs that occur irregularly can still be recurring operating expenses. Removing an unfavorable item simply because it lowers earnings is not a sound comparison method.
No. A management earnings adjustment does not itself change the recorded balance sheet. Adjust the denominator only when the stated equity policy requires it, using separate opening and closing reconciliations. Do not add the earnings adjustment to equity a second time without a defined basis.
No. Adjusted ROE usually normalizes reported profit or book equity under a management policy. Risk-adjusted measures use an explicitly defined risk or capital framework. The calculations, inputs and decisions served are different, so the terms should not be interchanged.