Blog · Finance metrics and formulas · Finance and FP&A teams
The cash conversion cycle counts the days between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. This page gives the formula and each leg, works it over two quarters for one company, values the change in cash, ties it to the balance sheet, explains negative cycles with figures from US 10-K filings, and lists the levers that shorten it.
The cash conversion cycle (CCC) is the number of days a company's cash is tied up between paying suppliers for goods and collecting from customers for them. It is days inventory outstanding plus days sales outstanding minus days payable outstanding. The company below runs 45.0 + 45.9 − 36.0 = 54.9 days in its first quarter and 61.4 days in its second, and the extra days cost it $150,357 of cash.
CCC = DIO + DSO − DPO
DIO = Inventory / Cost of sales × Days in period
DSO = Receivables / Revenue × Days in period
DPO = Payables / Cost of sales × Days in period
DIO is how long goods sit in stock, DSO how long customers take to pay, and DPO how long the company takes to pay suppliers. DIO plus DSO is the operating cycle: the days from receiving goods to collecting cash for them. Supplier credit covers part of that time, so the cash conversion cycle subtracts DPO. The Corporate Finance Institute's cash conversion cycle guide builds it the same way from the three legs.
Conventions vary. This page uses cost of sales for DIO and DPO, revenue (credit sales) for DSO, and the actual days in the period: 365 for a year, 90 or 91 for a quarter. Some analysts use 360 days, or revenue for every leg; neither is wrong, but the same convention must run every period. Each leg has its own page: days sales outstanding and days payable outstanding work them customer by customer and supplier by supplier.
From the income statement: revenue (credit sales) and cost of sales for the period. From the balance sheet: inventory, trade receivables and trade payables. For a year, average the opening and closing balances, or better, the twelve month-ends. The example below uses quarter-end balances so it matches the quarter already worked on the working capital, DSO and DPO pages.
One distributor. Q1 is January 1 to March 31, 2026 (90 days); Q2 is April 1 to June 30, 2026 (91 days).
| Line | Q1 2026 | Q2 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Days in quarter | 90 | 91 |
| Credit sales (USD) | 2,400,000 | 2,600,000 |
| Cost of sales (USD) | 1,560,000 | 1,690,000 |
| Receivables at quarter-end (USD) | 1,225,000 | 1,400,000 |
| Inventory at quarter-end (USD) | 780,000 | 830,000 |
| Payables at quarter-end (USD) | 624,000 | 600,000 |
| DIO (days) | 45.0 | 44.7 |
| DSO (days) | 45.9 | 49.0 |
| DPO (days) | 36.0 | 32.3 |
| CCC (days) | 54.9 | 61.4 |
Q1: DIO = 780,000 / 1,560,000 × 90 = 45.0; DSO = 1,225,000 / 2,400,000 × 90 = 45.9; DPO = 624,000 / 1,560,000 × 90 = 36.0; CCC = 54.9 days. The operating cycle is 45.0 + 45.9 = 90.9 days, of which suppliers fund 36.
Q2: DIO = 830,000 / 1,690,000 × 91 = 44.7; DSO = 1,400,000 / 2,600,000 × 91 = 49.0; DPO = 600,000 / 1,690,000 × 91 = 32.3; CCC = 61.4 days. The cycle lengthened by 6.4 days (61.38 − 54.94, unrounded). Stock turned slightly faster, but customers paid three days slower and suppliers were paid almost four days sooner.
In Excel, with revenue in B2, cost of sales in B3, days in B4 and receivables, inventory and payables in B5:B7:
=B6/B3*B4+B5/B2*B4-B7/B3*B4
Each day of a leg is worth one day of its flow: a day of DSO is a day of sales, a day of DIO or DPO a day of cost of sales. At Q2 rates, daily sales are 2,600,000 / 91 = $28,571 and daily cost of sales 1,690,000 / 91 = $18,571.
Cash effect of a change in days = Change in days × Daily revenue (DSO) or Daily cost of sales (DIO, DPO)
| Leg | Change in days | Daily rate (USD) | Cash tied up (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSO | +3.06 | 28,571 | 87,500 |
| DIO | −0.31 | 18,571 | −5,714 |
| DPO | −3.69 | 18,571 | 68,571 |
| Days effect | 150,357 |
Slower collection tied up $87,500 and earlier supplier payment $68,571; leaner inventory released $5,714. Net, the longer cycle tied up $150,357.
Trade working capital (receivables + inventory − payables) was 1,225,000 + 780,000 − 624,000 = $1,381,000 at March 31 and 1,400,000 + 830,000 − 600,000 = $1,630,000 at June 30: up $249,000. The cash effects must explain all of it. The rest comes from growth: Q1's days applied to Q2's higher daily flows.
| Part | DSO (USD) | DIO (USD) | DPO (USD) | Total (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days effect (above) | 87,500 | −5,714 | 68,571 | 150,357 |
| Volume effect (Q1 days × change in daily rate) | 87,500 | 55,714 | −44,571 | 98,643 |
| Movement in balances | 175,000 | 50,000 | 24,000 | 249,000 |
Each column ties to a balance: receivables rose $175,000, inventory $50,000, and payables fell $24,000. If the two effects do not sum to the movement on the balance sheet, a balance or a day count is wrong. Days × daily rate must also rebuild each balance: 49.0 × 28,571.43 = $1,400,000.
A negative cycle means customers pay before suppliers are paid, so suppliers finance the business. Three figures computed from the latest 10-K filings, using average balances, cost of sales and 365 days:
| Company (fiscal year end) | DIO | DSO | DPO | CCC (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sysco (June 27, 2026) | 27.5 | 24.5 | 34.8 | 17.2 |
| Costco (August 31, 2025) | 28.0 | 3.9 | 29.8 | 2.1 |
| Apple (September 27, 2025) | 10.7 | 32.1 | 114.7 | −71.8 |
Apple, for example: net sales of $416,161 million, cost of sales of $220,960 million, average trade receivables of $36,594 million, inventory of $6,502 million and payables of $69,410 million. Its payables are more than ten times its inventory, so suppliers fund far more than the goods on hand. Costco collects at the register and sells stock in about four weeks, so it nearly breaks even on the cycle. A food distributor such as Sysco extends credit to restaurants and runs positive. A negative cycle is a business model, not a target for every company.
The total cycle says cash is tied up; the ledger says where. Covirage's tools compute days by customer, site and supplier from your receivables, inventory and payables files; the external AI model explains the movement and never does the arithmetic. See Covirage for finance teams, and working capital for the balance sheet behind the cycle. For the KPIs it sits among, see financial KPIs; for the receivables leg, accounts receivable turnover ratio.
Shorter is better, but good depends on the business model. In their latest 10-K filings Sysco, a food distributor, ran about 17 days, Costco about 2 days and Apple about minus 72 days. Compare with your own history and with peers in the same sector, not across industries.
It means the company collects cash from customers before it has to pay suppliers, so suppliers are in effect financing its working capital. Businesses that sell inventory quickly, collect fast and pay suppliers on long terms can get there; Apple's fiscal 2025 figures give about minus 72 days.
The operating cycle is DIO plus DSO: the days from buying inventory to collecting cash from the sale. The cash conversion cycle subtracts DPO, because supplier credit covers part of that period. The difference is the time suppliers finance.
Collect faster (clear invoicing, follow-up on overdue customers, early-payment terms), hold less inventory (range and reorder points by SKU and site), and agree longer supplier terms where it does not raise prices. Each lever should be measured by customer, SKU or supplier, not only in total.